Our days are now a bit shorter - by about 1.26 microseconds (a microsecond is one millionth of a second).
You can read this report at:
Creating awareness of Global Desertification, Climate Change, and Agricultural Sustainability through the production of an environmental documentary and other education products including this blog, a website and training modules - developed in partnership with international educational institutions.
WEP/Women Environmental Programme, a Nigerian NGO GET'S IT! However, they only get part of the story.
In a recent Desertification Blog entry: No Green Wall Without Small-Scale Gardens for Women, Dr. Van Cotthem adds another important element to the demand of WEP that the Nigerian Federal Government speed up the implementation of the Green Wall Sahara (GWSP) Programme (WEP Wants Green Wall Sahara Programme).
The Executive Director of WEP believes "that the impact of desertification raise[s] security concerns, especially among the vulnerable groups." That is a very true and important statement. There is an urgent push from several fronts in support of the very same effort to begin executing some form of the Great Green Wall in northern Nigeria.
Dr. Van Cotthem then offers why he disagrees with WEP that "Sahelian rural women will be better off with adequate information on climate change necessary to evolve steps to control it.“ He also offers insight into just one of the many challenges that implementation of the GWSP will pose for all involved.
Logistics.
Not simply the logistical challenges of seedling production and regional access to move seedlings into target areas. The logistics of food production to support the labor required to implement each phase of the GWSP.
Professor Van Cotthem provides two reasons for his disagreement with WEP:
"Even supposing that there would be a small chance to find adequate information on climate change for rural women, I am not so sure that this will help these vulnerable women to handle their security concerns raised by the impact of desertification."
"Even if the Green Wall programme may play a little bit of an interesting role in some aspects of climate change, it will not be tremendously important for the rural families in the northern provinces of Nigeria and in the other countries concerned."
According to the Professor, what WILL make a critical difference is to enable rural Sahelian women with the resources to create "small-scale agriculture (or gardening) with reforestation in the Green Wall programme (agroforestry)."
The Professor knows from his direct, successful creation of the Seeds For Food home garden projects for the Saharawi Refugees in Algeria that it is possible to produce fresh fruits and vegetables in the barren regions of the Sahara Desert.
The success of GWSP will require the design and execution of effective tactical elements in conjunction with right logistical strategy to satisfy both immediate demands and program longevity.
The partnership must enable everyone who will be effected by the implementation AND outcome - that most certainly includes rural Sahelian women. Their battle is being fought everyday at ground zero.
"These labourers will have to be well fed. Tons of food will have to be produced at the local level. By whom? By the local women?"
Other links will be provided to introduce you to our growing team. The Sahara is just the program's initial destination.
I was reading through a recent USAID Asia Bureau funded report. It is a long report – 74 pages – that was prepared by the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, The Environmental Change & Security Program and The China Environment Forum. The title is: Asia’s Future/Critical Thinking for a Changing Environment (09/2009).
The details are dramatic.
I thought the best way to move through the report would be in several parts. Part 1 will be an introduction to the content of the report. Part 2 will provide excerpts that I found to be particularly dramatic that substantiate the challenges that face global sustainability.
The content is especially relevant is because of the global demands placed on Asia as it has become “the producer for the world.”
The impact of this report can be felt from its opening pages.
In Section 1.1 Long-Term Effects of Short-Term Thinking, the issues are laid out in plain view:
“This behavior (necessary expenditures are too often deferred, and capital is drawn down at unsustainable rates until suddenly disaster emerges, sending everything into crisis mode and further curtailing wise, long-term planning) may be one of the many factors at the root of the global economic crisis of 2009, but it also has parallels in biodiversity and the environment – [especially in Asia].’
‘Here too, natural capital is being expended faster than it can be replenished, and the mounds of waste pile ever higher, leaving future generations more environmentally impoverished.’
‘While Europe and the U.S. accomplished their own levels of environmental degradation over centuries, already densely populated Asia, with its lightning-speed economic development, natural resource-dependent economies, and globalization of trade, is currently playing out this environmental version of unsustainable growth in fast forward, and its rich biodiversity is paying the price.”
A panel of over 90 experts agreed that there are six primary trends and drivers that will most affect Asia’s future environment and biodiversity:
1. Rapid Economic Development and Rising Living Standards in Asia
2. Globalization of Trade and Demand for Asian Natural Resources
3. Rise of Asian Science and Technology
4. Exploding Energy Demand in Asia and Globally
5. Projected Effects of Climate Change and Post-Kyoto Mitigation Approaches
6. Continued Population Growth and Urbanization
“THE MOST IMPORTANT conclusion reached by the Wilson Center’s analysis on these trends is the urgent need for environmental sustainability—for sustainable use, sustainable consumption, sustainable development— in ways that do not enrich current generations at the expense of future ones.’
‘At least five of these six drivers and many of the related trends reflect unsustainable demand and use of Asia’s natural resources and environment, some of it originating from within the region and much from outside.
‘Most of the drivers are related to economics, as human economic activity, especially the pursuit of financial gain, is what is most significantly affecting Asia’s environment, both directly and indirectly.’
Most of these trends also demand ever increasing amounts of freshwater, a recurring theme.